Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2013, 11:44 AM
REXGEAR REXGEAR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 50
Default Too much weight? Any recomendations

I am thinking about upgrading my motor to a 2002 Yamaha 225 VMAX that weights about 539lb. I am concern about the weight on the transom, would it sit too low?

What do you guys recomend, and what do you think may be underpower?

Many thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2013, 11:59 AM
hugo hugo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: homestead Fl,
Posts: 261
Default

what size boat do you have? it is definetly heavy for a 20.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2013, 12:11 PM
REXGEAR REXGEAR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 50
Default

i have a 1985 MA 20ft.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2013, 12:15 PM
hugo hugo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: homestead Fl,
Posts: 261
Default

it definetly sounds heavy for that. are you running 20 inch transom or 25 inch? my 200 mercury weighs in at 395lbs and i cant imagen using anything heavier. and mine was 25 inch transom and i closed it in and installed a bracket because of the low open transom.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2013, 02:10 PM
REXGEAR REXGEAR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 50
Default

I am running a 25inch transom.

So, should i downgrade to something less than 200 or should i stay at 200hp? I am worried about been underpower and having an engine that may weight too much on the boat, which will affect the ride.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2013, 02:21 PM
hugo hugo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: homestead Fl,
Posts: 261
Default

the biggest thing to look for is weight to HP ratio. for me ive always seen mercury to be the lightest motors, early ones. all new engines are gonna be heavier especially 4 strokes. you realy dont want to exeed 400lbs on the transom if you can avoid it. thier are some realy good threads in this section just look around and get an idea of what you want. and alot of people here run much smaller engines and are very happy with them, just depends on what you want. racer, fishing, all around good performance? 200 on these boats is alot. ive seen some 225 and they just fly scarey in my opinion, realy just to much motor! good luck on your choice.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2013, 02:33 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Even a 200 is more than enough for a 20' SeaCraft, especially if you run intend to run offshore very much. It's a relatively light hull and tends to go airborne at speeds over 20 kts in seas over 3'. Adding more power that you can't use only adds excess weight to the transom and screws up the CG, raising min planing speed up to around 20 kts and hurting the ride.

I think the hull was originally rated for 170 hp and is much more efficient than most modern hulls, so it will plane at 10-12 mph and performs well with lightweight motors as small as 85-90 hp. I ran mine for over 30 years with a 300 lb V-4 that was about 100 hp at the prop and it was better balanced then than it is now with a 420 lb motor on a bracket. I had to go to a stern lifting 4B prop and a Doelfin on the new motor to get the min planing speed down to 12 mph where it was with the old motor! I think the optimum motor for the 20' hull for offshore use is about 130-150 hp and weighs no more than about 375 lbs!
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2013, 09:17 AM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushwacker View Post
I think the hull was originally rated for 170 hp and is much more efficient than most modern hulls, so it will plane at 10-12 mph and performs well with lightweight motors as small as 85-90 hp.
Actually, the original maximum HP rating on the outboard 20' was only 140 hp, until 1974 when it was raised to 175 hp.

The 20' hull was designed for single outboards of less than 300 lbs or twin outboards of less than 450 lbs total transom weight.

In 1969-71, they did make some of the 20' hulls to carry twins, but the1971 70 hp Evinrude/Johnson only weighed 202 lbs in the 20' shaft, and the '71 Merc 650 65hp was 217 lbs. These boats also had a larger fuel tank beneath the console, of (I think) 40 gallons capacity instead of the 27 gallon tank.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:36 PM
eggsuckindog eggsuckindog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,354
Default

The stanard motor at the largest dealer on the west coast was the 150 Merc inline - of course that was it. Then Merc did the V6 175 and the boat rated for that - 150-175 is fine, 200 is OK but somewhat overkill - and mine has a 200 and it will pin your ears back.

and in no uncertain terms will it handle 593lbs - 400 is it
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-09-2013, 10:36 AM
cdavisdb cdavisdb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,056
Default

Don't worry much about underpower. Light on the stern is usually better. I ran a 20 seafari(same hull as yours) for years with a old merc 150, often vastly overloaded with divers, 9-10 tanks, multiple iceboxes full of ice/fish etc. It had more power than I needed and no problems at all in maintaining a good cruising speed (25 knots or so). It would hit 40 light. Far more important is a combination of engine, prop, and hull that is able to stay on plane down below 15 knots.12 or 13 can be heaven when it gets nasty.

Last edited by cdavisdb; 01-09-2013 at 10:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft