Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-01-2012, 10:56 AM
ScottM ScottM is offline
Dieter Sprockets
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigeasy1 View Post
I may be mistaken but I think Water Rat,Chris Downey runs a 454 in his 23.
I'd like to see what his performance numbers are.
I'm sure Chris will chime in, but I don't think his performance with the big block is that much better than a small block. He's got it hitched to a Bravo drive and needs massive Kiekhafer trim tabs to keep her balanced. The biggest down side I've personally witnessed in his boat, and I'm sure he'll concur, is water through the scuppers due to that extra weight. With a couple guys in the back at rest, you've got a good 1" of seawater on deck. Typically I concur with "there's no substitute for cubic inches", but in the case of a 23, it seems to work against you.

The 350 just seems made for the 23; go for that and you'll be more than happy.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-01-2012, 12:35 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottM View Post
. . . Typically I concur with "there's no substitute for cubic inches", but in the case of a 23, it seems to work against you.

The 350 just seems made for the 23; go for that and you'll be more than happy.
It's definitely possible to have too much of a good thing! One friend of ours made the Abaco's trip with me and the "Unohu" in the late 70's in a 23 Sceptre with a 454/No. 2 Mercruiser drive, which was quite heavy because it required a marine transmission between engine and drive. He ran out of gas (with 100 gallon tank) before we got to Cooperstown, a distance of about 130-140 miles! We were headed to Guana Key that year, a distance of about 180 miles, and he was the only boat that couldn't make it non-stop. (I was carrying 80 gallons of gas in the Seafari, over half of it in jugs!) I averaged about 2.8 mpg with the 115 Evinrude and Bob got about 2.5 mpg with the 260 hp/350 Mercruiser in the Moesly 21.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-02-2012, 04:56 PM
Gary Hill Gary Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portsmouth, Va.
Posts: 138
Default

I went with the 350 Marine power carrb 315 HP and love it but when all my friends told me to go Fel injected I have not all the problems they get and cruise at 26-27 and get around 2-2.5 gal per mile. What the heck.
__________________
GARY
76 SEACRAFT CC INBOARD
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-02-2012, 09:58 PM
pelican pelican is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: cape may nj
Posts: 596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Hill View Post
I went with the 350 Marine power carrb 315 HP and love it but when all my friends told me to go Fel injected I have not all the problems they get and cruise at 26-27 and get around 2-2.5 gal per mile. What the heck.

those marine power engines are a very nice package,work very well in an inboard application - i've used a few of them
good warranty too
__________________
do not let common sense get in your way
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-03-2012, 10:06 AM
bigeasy1 bigeasy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: western massachusetts
Posts: 1,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottM View Post
I'm sure Chris will chime in, but I don't think his performance with the big block is that much better than a small block. He's got it hitched to a Bravo drive and needs massive Kiekhafer trim tabs to keep her balanced. The biggest down side I've personally witnessed in his boat, and I'm sure he'll concur, is water through the scuppers due to that extra weight. With a couple guys in the back at rest, you've got a good 1" of seawater on deck. Typically I concur with "there's no substitute for cubic inches", but in the case of a 23, it seems to work against you.

The 350 just seems made for the 23; go for that and you'll be more than happy.
Yeah, I love the 350 and no doubt that the extra weight of a 454 would be a factor with the thru-deck scuppers(I hate them).
I have that problem with the extra weight from the Yamaha kicker(105 lbs),and the four down riggers,each with 15lb weights,two off the stern,and two off the rear sides.
They drain fine when we are sitting forward or amidships,but if we have two of us standing in the rear,as when fighting and netting a fish,water pours in through them.It's not bad on a hot summer day,but in the spring with water temps in the high 30's forget about wearing sneakers.
I made a version of the "Vortex" out of some 2" long pieces of type m copper tube and the finger from a latex glove.Most of the time they work pretty well."most of the time"not all the time.
__________________
All this,just for a boat ride
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft