Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2015, 03:15 PM
WaveWalker WaveWalker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fl Keys
Posts: 59
Default Repower

Considering the 2015 115 Mercury 4s for my 1985 20 SF. If anyone has any experience with this motor or setup what are your opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2015, 07:52 AM
Terry England Terry England is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, Florida
Posts: 895
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaveWalker View Post
Considering the 2015 115 Mercury 4s for my 1985 20 SF. If anyone has any experience with this motor or setup what are your opinions?
The Tee Top and windshield may hold you back a little, but I would guess you would be in the neighborhood of 30-32 mph WOT with a perfect prop. Probably cruise comfortably at 20-23 mph and get 4 mpg. Unlike the Keys we make a lot of 60-80 mile days when we go bottom fishing off shore because there is very little structure inside of 45' off of Tampa. Good milage helps you use the boat more often. Just sit back and enjoy the VDH ride.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2015, 10:23 AM
72potter20 72potter20 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 82
Default

What is the weight of your hull? I would expect mid 30's for a standard gear case, faster for a command thrust Model. Merc performance reports put a command thrust 115 with Enertia prop on a 3300lb scout boat in the mid 40's top speed and best economy of around 6 mpg at cruise. I'm hoping to have some numbers in a week for a command thrust and powertech 14.25x21 pitch prop
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2015, 03:24 PM
WaveWalker WaveWalker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fl Keys
Posts: 59
Default

Definitely not going for any speed records, distance and fuel economy is what I am after. It's an 85 year model. not sure of the weight. Want to put a platform on the back, 60 gal tank shifted forward, remove the casting deck and put a fish box cooler up front and a livewell type leaning post/rocket launcher.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2015, 03:25 PM
WaveWalker WaveWalker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fl Keys
Posts: 59
Default

The leaning post.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2015, 03:41 PM
FishStretcher FishStretcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,117
Default

I suspect a slightly higher top speed. But I bet a 17P prop is close to what you want. I run a 15P on a yamaha F100 on a 75 20MA. And hit 33MPH at WOT. I suspect you will do a bit better.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-17-2015, 08:40 PM
72potter20 72potter20 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaveWalker View Post
Definitely not going for any speed records, distance and fuel economy is what I am after. It's an 85 year model. not sure of the weight. Want to put a platform on the back, 60 gal tank shifted forward, remove the casting deck and put a fish box cooler up front and a livewell type leaning post/rocket launcher.
I left my casting deck, but made it shorter so I could slide my console forward, batteries in the console and also put a new 50 gallon tank as far forward as it would go. I also have an aluminum leaning post And a closed transom with fiberglass bracket. My Boat will probably be lighter than yours as i haven't added a livewell or wash down system yet, those are future projects

[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-17-2015, 09:05 PM
WaveWalker WaveWalker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fl Keys
Posts: 59
Default

Looks good. Have you splashed her since the new motor?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-17-2015, 09:10 PM
72potter20 72potter20 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 82
Default

Not yet, Just brought the motor home today. Still have to rig it. I floated it with simulated motor/gas/gear weight to make sure she was ok with it and she sat perfectly.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-19-2015, 04:36 PM
McGillicuddy McGillicuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 32.77 N, 117.01 W
Posts: 2,184
Default

I expect it to be a winner. Lightweight w appropriate displacement to make up for being 4s. Good luck! Look forward to hearing performance nos.
__________________
there's no such thing as normal anymore...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft