Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 02-26-2019, 09:34 PM
lelandtampa lelandtampa is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 158
Default

I added some progress pics to my album on here. Easier to load to album than from 3rd party host. Was wondering if I should add any type of knee to the transom/stringer joint? Or just tab it in to the inner skin transom layup?planned Inner skin layers would be:
original skin,
1 layer 1708 entire transom
tab 2 layers 1708 stringers to transom
2 layers 1708 entire transom
Tab another layer stringer to transom
Last layer 1708 inside stringers to tie in splashwell
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 02-26-2019, 10:20 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

I apologize Leland, I’m not knowledgeable enough to answer that. My MA is virtually stock, and my replacement ‘99 transom at 20” is nothing to be proud of. I cannot offer you advice on your transom layup nor addition of “knees”. In race configuration, the knees were added weight. In recreational applications, I would assume strength. But I have learned my next transom rebuild will be 25-27”.

Vezo, Part II
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 02-26-2019, 11:13 PM
lelandtampa lelandtampa is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 158
Default

Thanks vezo I guess you are the only one that will communicate with me on here. Disco era master angler owners have to stick together.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 02-27-2019, 12:41 AM
FLexpat FLexpat is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lelandtampa View Post
Thanks vezo I guess you are the only one that will communicate with me on here. Disco era master angler owners have to stick together.
It's kinda like an open air bar - folks drift in and out - sometimes they lob comments and sometimes they just watch to see who is gonna say something.
You will get more comments by posting photos in the part of the thread you are talking about instead of separate albums since it is easier for some (like me) to connect the words with the pics.
What resin are you planning on? If its VE 1708 is perfect but if it is epoxy the CSM is not adding much but 'protection' and costing in weight and resin. I didn't really figure that out til I used a lot of epoxy on 1808 and 1708 on my transom.
You might want to run some numbers and figure out how much all that weighs relative to what you tore out.
As far as drains go it really depends on how light you build it and what you hang on it. The original design worked pretty well if it didn't have a lot of extra weight. I am using that on my 23 but going to 1-1/4" tubes.
Vezo is right - build your transom 1-2" taller than your motor and 26 is a good minimum. Knees are useful if there are high loads for some reason - not sure if you have that situation.
Since I don't have a MA I'll just hang out for another happy hour and wait for a few more boat porn pics.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 02-27-2019, 07:19 AM
Old Goat Old Goat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lelandtampa View Post
Easier to load to album than from 3rd party host.
Problem with 3rd party is when third party host goes belly up, All good info is lost forever!
When they are here, they are here for as long as this site is.
Use the Yellow Picture icon up top and paste Image address in it to show up here.












Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 02-28-2019, 07:36 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

Leland, not to derail your thread but, Old Goat, would you happen to know where there’s an old Pontiac Firebird? 1970-73? Thanks.

Vezo.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 02-28-2019, 09:18 PM
Old Goat Old Goat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 60
Default

Like I always say, "It's not what I know, it's who I know."

Ask the Firebird guys on this forum;
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/index.php
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 03-01-2019, 05:51 AM
Kraken Kraken is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 113
Default

Looks good. I second the VE and 1708 comment. VE is great to work with. Stronger than poly, better protection against water intrusion, doesn’t need to be top layer or have wax added to get it to cure. Also cheaper than epoxy.

I also have issues with the lack of responses on my build. I was thinking that documenting it was a wast of my time.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 03-01-2019, 07:53 AM
uncleboo uncleboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edenton, NC
Posts: 1,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kraken View Post
I also have issues with the lack of responses on my build. I was thinking that documenting it was a wast of my time.
It goes in spurts. I'm glad I documented mine and glad you and so many others have as well. This site is one of my happy places. Don't stop the pictures, please!
__________________
1975 SF18/ 2002 DF140
1972 15' MonArk/ 1972 Merc 50
http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/z...photos/SC3.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 10-20-2019, 04:07 PM
lelandtampa lelandtampa is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 158
Default

I am getting ready to tie the splashwell back into the transom and hull sides. I am thinking 2 layers of 12 oz biax tabbing on top side and 3 below . Gonna be a pain laying on my back in the bilge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft