Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-13-2015, 08:42 AM
uncleboo uncleboo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edenton, NC
Posts: 1,583
Default

Hello, Boca. I have an 18 with a Suzuki 140 4 stroke and love everything about it, BUT, the weight. At 436 lbs., it's a lot back there. However, after moving batteries forward and careful weight placement, I use mine with no worries. My biggest problem, I think, is that the boat will fall off plane at around 3000 rpm. I think it's just the excessive weight and possibly the 21 pitch prop I'm running. When the time comes, (meaning money), I'll be doing several changes. I plan on raising the floor, getting all the plywood out, except the transom, and replacing with composite, then moving the console forward about 8". Moving the console has a twofold effect. It'll give me more forward weight to offset the weight of the motor and give me more fishing room. With all that said, I've been to the Gulfstream twice with her and had a ball. Planning on going back soon while the dolphin are getting thick! Good luck with her!
__________________
1975 SF18/ 2002 DF140
1972 15' MonArk/ 1972 Merc 50
http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/z...photos/SC3.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-13-2015, 09:45 AM
dave s dave s is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Default

Wasn't there another 18SF here in Boca Raton? I think he was running a older Yamaha 130 and was considering a Suzuki DF140.
That makes at least 3 18s and a lot of 20s.

With all the modifications to my 18 I'm thinking of a 150 Merc or Suzuki.
I fish loaded down and offshore mostly and I want to be able run lower rpms in the slop and cruise in the 30s.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-13-2015, 11:47 AM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

My brother has an '87 or '88 Tracker 18 purchased in '96 with an OMC 120. Upgraded to a '95 OMC rebuilt 150. With the 47 gallon tank it would damn near keep up with my '79 MA with a '99 OMC 175, very close to 50 mph boats without gear.

When that engine crapped the bed he went with the 140 Zuke. He is very happy with a little less top end, but significant fuel savings.

My SeaCraft rarely sees the light of day because of the simplicity of my recently sold 1982, refurbished myself in 2005, Boston Whaler Sport 15. Went with an '05 F60, mounted on a Bob's fixed jack plate. She was a 44 mph boat but weighs less than 500 pounds plus 18 gallons of fuel, and a forward mounted 48 qt. cooler.

My next project is an '88 BW sport custom center consul. I have everything I need to rig an F70, minus engine and prop. They're freaking expensive!

As you can see we tend to overpower. But I earned an arse of respect for the etecs this weekend!!! IMHO, I would never contemplate a 70 horse on an 18. Just my two cents.

Vezo, Part II
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-13-2015, 12:24 PM
BocaSeacraft BocaSeacraft is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 26
Default

Great information from everyone. It seems we all have different setups aimed at satisfying different needs. We're lucky our Seacrafts are such versatile boats. I'm still on the fence about power. My cousin is a marine mechanic and tells me the F70 is a fine motor with great power to weight ratio. Now, if Yamaha would just run a sale on these things.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-13-2015, 01:39 PM
72potter20 72potter20 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 82
Default

You should consider the new 115 mercury 4 stroke. Pushes my 20sf to 45 mph easily, hit 46.1 with a light load. This with the motor mounted to low and it weighs Less than the new yamaha 4 stroke and much less than the 140 zuke At around 360 lbs

The 150 merc on these hulls would scream
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-13-2015, 03:01 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

I'm not a Merc guy but would have to agree. My ten years with my F60 were flawless minus three broken steering tubes, and I do not trailer far. Of course, my neighbors delivery three weeks ago, I discovered she is "making" oil. Hopefully a bad thermostat causing it to run on enrichener mode. We shall see.?.?.!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-18-2015, 03:23 PM
T-MAN T-MAN is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 28
Default Yamaha re-power

BocaSeacraft

I just repowered my '76 18' with the new Yamaha 115 a couple of weeks ago. I did not move batteries under the console and wish I had plus I had put a 40 gallon Moeller which I don't regret. She squats a little but not too bad.

I decided before I did anything else I would try putting 50# bag of sand in the front and it helped. I had a Merc 2004 115 hp and I like this new one a lot better.

Good luck
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-18-2015, 08:44 PM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vezo, Part II View Post
I'm not a Merc guy but would have to agree. My ten years with my F60 were flawless minus three broken steering tubes, and I do not trailer far. Of course, my neighbors delivery three weeks ago, I discovered she is "making" oil. Hopefully a bad thermostat causing it to run on enrichener mode. We shall see.?.?.!
making oil on a four stroke is an easy fix.... Run it at 5500 for about 10-15 minutes on the way in every trip. Reduces coking as well and keeps everything running well.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-18-2015, 09:57 PM
BocaSeacraft BocaSeacraft is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 26
Default

Thanks T-Man. Nice looking 18.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-18-2015, 10:56 PM
McGillicuddy McGillicuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 32.77 N, 117.01 W
Posts: 2,184
Default

I hear you clearly on the light weight, but at the risk of spending your money, I would seriously consider a little more umph to get out of tricky troughs if it gets sketchy in those southland inlets.

I think the the 90 etec, 90 zuke, and the new 2.1 Liter 115 Merc 4-s are all good calls. Nice mix of appropriate weight to power for a V-hull. They all have gearing available to spin more prop and can probably get you out of a jam in a jiffy. Not so sure about a Yammie 70.

If you're a Yammie loyalist and thinking new, their 115 has dropped 20 lbs into the first run etec 115 weight class (375lbs i think). I think new etec 115 is over 400 lbs. Mercs Optimax is in that 375 weight range too, but once you've run in relative silence, its hard to go back.
__________________
there's no such thing as normal anymore...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft