Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-29-2013, 11:57 PM
Snookerd Snookerd is offline
Founding Father
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff79Sceptre View Post
I'll probably go with the 175 etecs then. Only 60 pounds more than these 150's total. ...... I'll save that for a later thread. Thanks everyone!
Good luck Jeff! And keep the posts and pictures coming.
__________________
Snookerd
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:29 AM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old'sCool View Post
skiblet needs to post some pics
Here's a shot of Skiblet's boat from the Long Point gathering in 2008. It does look to be sitting a bit low in the stern, but it would be worse with those 4-strokes! Current weight on the 25" small-block E-TEC is 433 lbs and would definitely be a better choice than the 4-stroke, with lower total operating costs (fuel + oil + maintenance) than any of the 4-strokes per this article
http://www.boatingmag.com/engines/ou...MjQ1NDU1MzI5S0. The article is a bit misleading because they only evaluated costs for 300 hours, and all the 4-strokes require a valve lash inspection/adjustment at 500 hrs which would add several hundred $ to their costs. If they had run the comparisons for 600 hrs, and E-TEC would save even more $ because the fuel costs were almost identical to the 4-strokes, so the significant difference is in the maintenance costs!

However a big single plus a kicker would be my choice - much less weight and cost and much less to maintain. I'd also question if a single 4-stroke would have enough low end torque plane the boat of one if them died! If it won't plane on one engine, you won't be able to run much faster than you could with a 15 hp kicker, which will push it to hull speed! Check out this post by DonV's brother, where he learned all about that torque difference when he replaced a pair of 225 4-strokes with a couple of E-TEC 200HO's: http://www.etecownersgroup.com/post/...00-hos-6556802
Attached Images
 
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-30-2013, 03:38 AM
77SceptreOB 77SceptreOB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbia, SC.
Posts: 1,611
Default

Here is a friend of mines 23' SeaCraft "Savage" model with twin 4 stroke 150hp Yamahas. The stern sits pretty low in the water as you can see. I imagine twin 200's would be about the same. As a point of reference, he has an Armstrong aluminum non floatation bracket. The tower probably also has an effect on pushing the COG to the rear. The best I remember, he said it is NOT self bailing at rest and need the plugs in at all times except when planing. Otherwise the performance is very good.
Attached Images
  
__________________
1977 SeaCraft 23' Sceptre W/ Alum Tower & Yamaha 225
www.LouveredProductsUnlimited.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft