#1
|
|||
|
|||
Prop testing results.
Denny was kind enough to bring some props for a little real world comparo.
I have been talking w/ Bobby Soles and he said the alum 3 blade would be of no use because it had been repitched. I wish we had tried it in retrospect. The boat is an`89 Slacker 20sf. Power is `96 Rude 150 w/ 940 hours. Full fuel, bimin up, and 2 people. 30 gal livewell was empty. The variation between upwind and downwind was, as Denny noted, quite consistent so I will only report down wind. I missed a little data, but I feel this will be a good and comprehensive real world baseline for my little friend. Here are the contestants and the numbers. Apollo 4bl Mirage + 3 bl Powertech 4bl 14.125x 20p 15.380x 17p 15x 15p MPH GPS---> Rpm 2300 11.7 13.2 --- 2500 11.9 15.1 12.9 3000 23.2 23.9 21.5 3500 30.0 28.3 26.0 3750 32.6 30.2 27.3 4000 35.2 33.8 29.6 4500 39.7 --- 32.3 4800 {can`t turn it} 39.0 --- 5300 {can`t turn it} {can`t turn it} 37.7 My wot #s are a little off. The PT and Apollo ventilate progressivly and the #`s are maybe 200rpm too fast. The Mirage blows out hard and immediately. Here are my thoughts and impressions. The Apollo had too much pitch and was not proppppperly represented. The Mirage was too much dia. to be proppppperly represented. The Powerech was just about right. Had all things been equal, I feel the numbers would have been far closer. Again the question remains, how did the Apollo still win top end while having way too much pitch and one more blade? Cheers, GFS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|