Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 08-27-2015, 03:24 PM
76Red18 76Red18 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NORTH FORT MYERS, FL.
Posts: 671
Default

Prop might be losing it's bite. You say the engine is 3" high. I would lower it a hole and see what happens.
As far as proper trim, that depends on conditions. With my 18 in rough water, where I need to stay below a certain speed to keep the hull in the water(15-25 mph), I pretty much have the engine trimmed in and use the tabs to keep the running surface as level as possible(best ride). In really bad conditions(below 15 mph), no tabs and use the engine trim to keep the bow from stuffing. When I need to speed, I peg the throttle, trim the engine until there's a little prop ventilation, bring the trim down a little, then use the tabs to stay level and pick the whole hull up out of the water a little bit more. Might need to bring the engine trim down a little more.

As far as best ride goes, I bet Mr. Moesly would say to keep the running surface as level as possible regardless of how much of the hull is in the water.

A 4 blade Bay Pro III prop would do wonderful things for the ride characteristics of a 20 with a heavy motor on it's arse...
__________________
" I'm the one thats got to die when its time for me to die; so let me live my life, the way I want to".
J. M. Hendrix
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-27-2015, 06:26 PM
83seacraft20sf 83seacraft20sf is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks. I've seen pics of your boat before. Beauty. I agree. I think I was trimming up to far. I questioned the engine height, but was told by the mech of 35 years it is in the best position for performance. I'm gonna play with it a little more. I will have them lower if I'm not satisfied.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-14-2015, 07:49 AM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 404
Default

Maybe there is no answer to this question........

Why hasn't / didn't Seacraft revive the 21' hull as a re launched offering as a boat model ?
Seems no other 21' has the similar hull design, and was superior performer.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-16-2015, 01:48 PM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgreene View Post
Maybe there is no answer to this question........

Why hasn't / didn't Seacraft revive the 21' hull as a re launched offering as a boat model ?
Seems no other 21' has the similar hull design, and was superior performer.
Yawn.... My guess is when Potter took the reigns over from Carl he changed the original design to "his" version and target products. Maybe there were creative differences or maybe Bill just felt his redesign was more marketable. In any case Bill decided not to for whatever the reason.

In the boat business it's not always about what works the best but what sells. New SeaCrafts don't even exist anymore. It does't mean they weren't great boats, just that nobody else wanted to run with the ball.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft