|
|
#1
12-29-2013, 12:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Twin f200 yammies
Thinking about a repower after the twin 150's die. I'm tossing around the idea of twin inline fourstrokes. I see where the new motors weigh roughly 100lbs more each than my oceanrunners. 385lbs is the dry weight that's assumed for the old motors. My boat is a 23 Sceptre with a bracket. I did just install a new 160 gallon fuel tank. A 165 quart cooler fits in the forward box allowing me to distribute weight forward. The boat now takes water on in the scuppers with 2 people in the stern. With the cooler full of ice and beverages is not near as bad. I wonder how the boat would roll and does anyone have twin fourstrokes on their older hull now? I guess I could plug the scuppers but I do like the self bailing I have now. Also, I'm not interested in a single motor. 50 miles to the fishing grounds is common. Or is there another bracket made for the heavier weight?
|
|
#3
12-29-2013, 07:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know. It came with the boat. It's got a 27" setback. Very well made though.
|
|
#4
12-29-2013, 08:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those new 200's are at 500lbs each. IMHO those motors still are too heavy for twins on a Hermco bracket. It can be done and someone will do it, but if you want that option go 200 Etec small block with a Hermco bracket.
__________________
Snookerd
|
|
#5
12-29-2013, 08:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jeff, it sound like you already have weight issues and adding twin 4 strokes will likely make things worst. If you are not willing to consider a more weight effective single I would go with the lightest 2 strokes I could find.
The only other option I would recommend is a big single with an auxiliary motor that you could store up front. Much less costly and offers the same security. I went this option for a few years until I got tired of the extra weight and now it lives in the shed under a tarp. I fully understand your concerns for the distance you fish offshore. Like you my average round trip out into the lonely gulf is 120 nautical on a light day. In the end you have to be comfortable with your equipment but redundancy in power has a steep consequence curve on a small boat.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
|
|
#6
12-29-2013, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
12-29-2013, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes look up skiblet(use the search feature)... On a non hermco bracket. 23SF not a Sceptre. CG is farther back without the cabin and not the largest flotation bracket. It seems to sit they way you would expect it to and he is happy with it. Very nice boat.
__________________
Snookerd
|
|
#8
12-29-2013, 11:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll probably go with the 175 etecs then. Only 60 pounds more than these 150's total. I didn't want to buy oil but there is no "cheap " when owning a boat of this age. Also buying American sounds great to me anyhow. Currently I'm getting 1.5 mpg with these 98 motors which I don't think is bad. Plus it moves pretty good when you throw in the corner. I would hope that the 175's would push it above 50 mph. Right now the boat tops out at 43. Top end is not what I'm after but outrunning a storm is always nice. I really haven't seen anything on the 2013 etec reviews but I'll save that for a later thread. Thanks everyone!
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
