Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2006, 10:15 PM
mjquatt mjquatt is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 22
Default E-TEC vs Four Stroke

A while back there was a lengthy discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of the new E-TEC outboards compared to fourstrokes. I looked back a ways but was unable to find the postings. If anyone has some insight into this subject the feedback would be greatly appreciated. I have pretty much decided on the size outboard I will use on my 20 SF but have not decided on the make.

Thanks
Michael
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2006, 01:10 AM
Fishjack Fishjack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gulf Coast of Mississippi
Posts: 244
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

First let me tell you I do not own an E-Tec..
I have several friends that do own E-Tec’s and really like them. They include 75hp, 200hp and 250hp.

One thing to consider about the E-Tec’s is the oil they recommend you run is pretty expensive. It is not regular TCW-III it is some sort of synthetic BMC proprietary oil.. About $36.00/gal.
If you plan on running the E-Tec on regular TCW-III (from what I understand) the dealer has to program the ECM for TCW-III and that cut's down on the efficiency.

They burn much less oil than regular 2 strokes. It just cost quite a bit more for the E-Tec oil.

E-Tek owners please correct me if I am wrong..

Jack
__________________
"Anything you let a dog do, you're training it to do." -
1977 23' Superfish
ST250x Yam
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2006, 03:30 AM
19seacraft88 19seacraft88 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

Michael
I just purchased a 200hp E-tec. First of all the XD100 oil I paid $25.00 a gallon. If you use the XD50 it uses 40% more oil than the XD100. The engine is super quiet, very echonomical, and at WOT I can talk on my boat at normal tone of voice.
I also ran E-tec on Blackfin boats, with twins. In the 200hp and 225hp. Boats were 25 and 32 footers. Both did very well maximum speed on the 25 was 57mph, and the 32 hit 62.
Good luck in your decission.
Al
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-19-2006, 09:09 AM
ScottM ScottM is offline
Dieter Sprockets
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 2,221
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

Bluewater,
A 32' Blackfin hit 62mph with a pair of 200s/225s? Is this the same Blackfin of the 80s/early 90s, or something different?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2006, 01:50 PM
19seacraft88 19seacraft88 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

It is the same mold, purchased by a company in south Florida. They now call it Blackfin.
Al
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-20-2006, 10:18 AM
Yamtt125 Yamtt125 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange, CT fish Norwalk Islands
Posts: 130
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

To save money on oil, buy it from a place that buys the oil by the drum. It will be cheaper than buying individual gallons. All you have to do if bring a small gas can to them and they'll fill it up for you.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-24-2006, 08:15 PM
mjquatt mjquatt is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 22
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

Thanks for the info guys. This should help me make a descsion
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2006, 02:09 PM
eggsuckindog eggsuckindog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,354
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

You can't run regular oil - period, DI motors oil differently and crankcase temps are higher. A close friend replaced a Merc 150 with a new '03 DI 200 (close to an Etec) almost threw out the back on the water test, after he was warned LOL, but he says its amazing the difference. The guy has 2 more of the same motors a 225 and 250 in the box 7 tr warrenty
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-28-2006, 11:03 PM
Jon G Jon G is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 328
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

go over to www.thehulltruth.com and do some reading on the e-tec. I was interested in them and theres a few not so happy customers with them to my suprise. I love my 140 Suzi but I wanted to keep an eye on the e-tecs for next time.
__________________
I support the I'm glad I can afford one boat theory!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-30-2006, 11:30 PM
Scott Scott is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,272
Default Re: E-TEC vs Four Stroke

Quote:
go over to www.thehulltruth.com and do some reading on the e-tec. I was interested in them and theres a few not so happy customers with them to my suprise. I love my 140 Suzi but I wanted to keep an eye on the e-tecs for next time.
Dont know whats being said over on that site ... But this months PowerBoat reports has some very interesting test data that involved six 150 hp motors (four- four strokes and two - two strokes) Including The Honda, Suzuki, Verado, Yamaha ... Plus the E-tec and the Optimax. Dont think it was E-tecs day

A 32 blackfin @ 60 + mph ??? The 14 or 15,000 lbs Blackfin boat with 12 foot beam?...got to be a different boat. The boat almost draws 3 feet of water !!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft