#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
I only have this shot from the Sebastian trip. This is a 1987 18SF with a 140Suzuki. Notice those 3 heavy weights I am standing next to............. ......When the Zuke salesman says you can put 4 people in the back of the 18SF and still be able to have the deck height above the water line, this is what he means
__________________
Snookerd |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
I'm putting a Merc 175 Optimax Pro XS on the back of mine, and for me, this is ideal.
If you don't mind fielding questions from your non-expert boating friends on why you didn't purchase a 4-stroke (because that is what everyone is doing), then I would seriously consider staying with either the e-tec or optimax. You can never have enough power and they are just as efficient if not more in certain settings. The 175 Opti and 200 small block e-tec weigh as much as the 140 Zuke. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
The e tec has no break in or maint for 3 yrs. I`m curious what the maint cost is for the Zuke. All I`ve spoken with love them .
GFS |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
140 suzukis are around 8k. We got ours for 7K with the 6 yr warranty because it was a left-over. Add rigging,controls,tax and it was 9200 out the door.
__________________
Snookerd |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
My 2001 115 Suzuli 115's run like the wind and sip fuel. I recently was out with a fishing guide with a 250 etec. I don't have time to go into details but HE would never choose etec again! Also how about 40-50 bucks a gallon for oil? Yikes! And you can do most of the maintainance on your 140 by your self.
Just ask yourself a simple question. If (whatever brand car you currently drive) offered an etec, would you get that as an option? 140 Zule all the way.
__________________
Capt. Brian |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
Brian I know you have Zukes and they excellent engines - the 140 would a good option BUT that 1 gallon of oil at 100/1 will go further than 2 oil changes - moot point
I am a 2 stroke fan admitted, that being said and having a Merc 200 on my boat - IMHO the Etec's are probably the best engine being built today - power-weight-sound-fuel-maintaince-and probably longetivity. As I said a 150 will damn near throw you out the back on a 20, a 200 almost did on a 22 Sea Ray Laguna after the owner was already warned to hold on replaced a 150 Merc I would not put a 115 of anything on it, including an Etec, just not enough mid range power and the fuel would go down working harder -JMHO
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
PS Todd is the only guide in the whole state I think that seems to have had any issues - maybe its his dealer ???
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"Ideal\" power for a 20' '87 Superfisherman?
Deep,
I have a 1973 20SF w/ 1998 150 Mercury and it performs well. Although there are times I wish I had about 25 more HP, mine runs plenty strong, 3.8MPG, and tops the boat @ 42 WOT. I do not need the speed as much as would like additional power off shore (rough sea conditions) etc. If I was to buy new, I would strongly consider the 150 E-Tech or 175 Suzuki. I have a 47 gallon tank and they both would perform well for power and range. Good luck |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|