Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2014, 06:40 PM
Boatman2506 Boatman2506 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Default 18 sold.....NOW FOR A 20!!!! Started today!!

So someone wanted my 76 18sf more than I did so I let her go down the road and make another family happy! Now I'm excited to jump on a 20SF and get her ship shape again!! This one doesn't need nearly as much work as my 18 did, but I'm still excited to see the results!! Planning on have paint and repairs done next week then going to start rigging! Going with awl grip fighting lady yellow hull sides and console, Kingston gray boot stripe, Brite white topside with Kingston gray non skid.... SHOULD SET HER OFF!!! Will keep everyone posted as I move along. Thanks!
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2014, 06:46 PM
Boatman2506 Boatman2506 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Default Why do "tracker" seacrafts get a bad rap?

I just finished a 76 "potter" now starting my 86 "tracker" SC 20. From what I'm seeing, the trackers were made much better than the potters! Thicker glass, cleaner fit and finish, way more floatation, ZERO FLEX in hullsides where as my 76 had a TON of flex to it, better consoles, better more spacious rigging tubes, and way better job of sealing in wood on hatch lids..... So why the bad rap on trackers? Anyone??
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2014, 06:48 PM
Boatman2506 Boatman2506 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Default 3

3
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2014, 06:49 PM
Boatman2506 Boatman2506 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Default 4

4
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2014, 06:54 PM
Boatman2506 Boatman2506 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Default 5

5
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-20-2014, 06:56 PM
Boatman2506 Boatman2506 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Default You will be missed!!!!!:(

Bye bye 18....
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-20-2014, 08:53 PM
ocuyler ocuyler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 44.41 -75.79
Posts: 1,490
Cool It's all good...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boatman2506 View Post
I just finished a 76 "potter" now starting my 86 "tracker" SC 20. From what I'm seeing, the trackers were made much better than the potters! Thicker glass, cleaner fit and finish, way more floatation, ZERO FLEX in hullsides where as my 76 had a TON of flex to it, better consoles, better more spacious rigging tubes, and way better job of sealing in wood on hatch lids..... So why the bad rap on trackers? Anyone??
This is a Potter based site, so I certainly would not indicate that there is any negative comparison to a Tracker built boat. I think there is a big "romance" factor, much like the Moesly built boats. Having rebuild all three, I have no preference, as I, and all others have stripped them down and made them their own.

At the end of the day, i think we all celebrate the terrific designs and efforts that Carl Moesly and Bill Potter that worked hard to bring these terrific boats to those of us that appreciate them. Tracker? - well, they built some decent boats too. I love my '89 23 CC almost as much as the '70 20 CC and '67 19 Bowrider. Just glad to be in the game.
__________________
Otto
And yes, I still believe in the four boat theory...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-20-2014, 09:07 PM
Boatman2506 Boatman2506 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Smile RE:

I totally agree.....Since the Potter came first I can see the love being for them. But my viewpoint on it is every year materials, resins, glass, etc, get better and lighter, and we learn what we thought was once good is now inferior. The hull design of the potters were way ahead of their time, but I honestly think tracker did some good things with the boats. Either way, both are good boats and are derived from the same design anyway. I bet the negative feedback is from someone who knows someone who knew someone....Not from real owners. Regardless I am excited to get this baby back on the water!! Thanks for your input
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-20-2014, 09:07 PM
Boatman2506 Boatman2506 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Default No doubt rusty!!

When you gonna let me get my hands on your master angler?!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-20-2014, 09:09 PM
FLexpat FLexpat is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 669
Default

It's the shape way more than the vintage. (hull AND care!)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft